The following weekend Britain’s Lewis Hamilton will procure his fourth Formula One title at the United States Grand Prix.
His Mercedes team is a shocking 145 points before arch-rivals Ferrari regardless of the sport introducing rules this season which aimed to set the brakes about the dominance of a single outfit. They came at a price.
The new regulations were created to create for shorter racing by increasing aerodynamic and mechanical traction during the introduction of wider tyres and wings.
According to one of the teams it has “rewritten” the rulebook and the effect is just as noticeable off track as on it.
But if a few had hoped the rules might stop Mercedes from working out with all the F1 championship they will have become disappointed. Ironically, they also have pushed up its competitors’ costs.
Only the frontrunners have had the funds to foot the bill from their cashflow whilst one of the outfits lower the grid down had to find a driver to pay the price tag.
Research has revealed that new regulations fuelled a #167.6m gain in the F1 teams’ costs in 2016. They climbed 14.5 percent to strike a combined #1.3bn – the highest-ever total listed in the sport.
F1 cars have been designed the year before they race therefore the bulk of the investment in them is paid for then, too. It means the price of this year’s effort is represented in the teams’ 2016 accounts along with the last one of these has been filed a week.
Eight of F1’s ten teams have to document publicly-available accounts – the only exceptions are Ferrari because its ensemble is conducted by the car manufacturer, also Swiss-based Sauber where companies don’t have to release their finances.
The costs of the teams’ working companies came to a mean of #165.9m 2016, topped with Northamptonshire-based Mercedes which spent #274.9m considering that the investment in its own motors.
It is the highest ever total listed on the balances of a British F1 team as well as eclipses the turbocharged spending amounts prior to the 2008 economic crash which drove Toyota and Honda from this sport.
In the other end of this spectrum will be last year’s new entrant Haas F1 which spent a third up to the tournament leaders.
Haas has managed to keep its costs down by using a new rule permitting teams to purchase in more parts than previously. Haas utilizes a Ferrari motor with a chassis created by Italian manufacturer Dallara which additionally makes the cars to get the F2 junior series.
Determined by providers reduces research and development cost which, along with engine and staffing costs, is just one of their main costs – it climbed across the board from 2016 as teams had to design automobiles to satisfy the new regulations.
They had been released with F1’s governing body the Federation Internationale de l’Automobile (FIA) to address criticism that the results of races was apparent before they started as a result of dominance of Mercedes.
Together with Hamilton at the wheel it has won the constructors’ and the drivers’ championship for the last three years running. This season is set to be no distinct but there’s been a far higher price to cover.
Writing in the introduction into the accounts Mercedes’ team boss Toto Wolff notes there was “an increase of #27.9m in operating costs mainly on account of the impact of technical regulation changes and movement in foreign exchange rates”.
The 2016 accounts for Force India, also established in Northamptonshire, give more insight to the effort necessary to meet the new rules.
It states that united with the change in tyre-sizes “our traditional method of retaining 50% of the last season’s car and upgrading the remaining 50% is not feasible to get 2017”. Over 90% of Force India’s car this season is totally new.
The team planned to cover its increased costs with income from an unlikely source: a motorist contract signed with Russian kid, Nikita Mazepin, “procured a money injection before considerable regulation changes before this 2017 season”, said Force India.
Mazepin was only 16 when he signed up last year and he has tested for the team twice since that time, most recently in July following the Hungarian Grand Prix. He has ample funds to cover as his dad Dmitry became a billionaire through owning the mineral fertiliser producer Uralchem.
In spite of this, Force India still chalked up a net loss of #11.6m – the biggest of any team in 2016.
The law changes dented the main point of British production giant McLaren. Its went from a net #3.4m profit in 2015 into a after-tax loss of #3.2m the following year.
Overall the teams made a combined net loss of #2m past year. Perhaps surprisingly this is not anything new as unlike most businesses, profit is not the barometer of success in F1.
Rather teams judge their operation on rushing results and tend to spend all of their income on this in a bid to get success.
Some pump more than they create, with additional funds usually coming from owners’ debt or pockets. The concept is that it’s far better to acquire and make no profit than create money and complete low in the standings.
Victory on track increases a team’s ability to earn more payoff,, as brands are ready to pay more to be associated with a winner.
The teams’ earnings generally comes from three sources with two supplying the lion’s share. They’re fuelled by F1’s enormous television viewers (390m viewers last year). The first key revenue source is sponsorship which contains around a third of the teams’ earnings,
Another third comes from prize money. F1’s parent firm, which will be owned by American investment firm Liberty Media, pays the teams around 66 percent of its yearly earnings as prize money and it came to $985.5m (#742m) in 2016.
Payments from owners represent around half of the teams’ remaining earnings and the advertising benefit from the vulnerability on TV compensates with this particular investment.
If costs increase these obligations frequently rise to compensate and past year Red Bull poured four times more cash into its flagship team. Its investment to Red Bull Racing hit #40.6m as costs surged 9.2 percent to #197m.
As its owner has pockets Red Bull Racing does not have to rely on drivers that cover but income from these is the remaining source of earnings to F1 teams. They’re a hallmark of teams at the base of the grid but their days could be numbered.
Despite numerous failed attempts F1 hasn’t given up on introducing a budget cap and recent reports suggest that Liberty Media will likely introduce strategies to the teams for introduction in 2021 if their present race contracts expire. But It’ll be the sport’s governing body, the FIA, which will finally decide on any changes
A limit of #114m was suggested and this could level the playing area as the tiniest teams have been already beneath this although the frontrunners would have to scale back.
Although it may seem like a logical way for the sport to go in it could make the recent rise in spending appear all the more pointless.